Phase IV – Plan Summary

Phase IV – Plan Summary

Points: 280 Assignment 4: Phase IV – Plan Summary
Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Identify the current issue that the business is facing and propose an HRIS solution. Introduce the HR function that you chose as the focus of your business proposal, and explain the potential benefit for the business if that function is addressed.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely identified the current issue that the business is facing and did not submit or incompletely proposed an HRIS solution. Did not submit or incompletely introduced the HR function that you chose as the focus of your business proposal, and did not submit or incompletely explained the potential benefit for the business if that function is addressed. Partiallyidentified the current issue that the business is facing and partially proposed an HRIS solution. Partially introduced the HR function that you chose as the focus of your business proposal, and partially explained the potential benefit for the business if that function is addressed. Satisfactorilyidentified the current issue that the business is facing and satisfactorily proposed an HRIS solution. Satisfactorily introduced the HR function that you chose as the focus of your business proposal, and satisfactorily explained the potential benefit for the business if that function is addressed. Thoroughlyidentified the current issue that the business is facing and thoroughly proposed an HRIS solution. Thoroughly introduced the HR function that you chose as the focus of your business proposal, and thoroughly explained the potential benefit for the business if that function is addressed.
2. Propose a type of HRIS for the organization in the scenario. Discuss the function that the HRIS serves, and identify how that system will solve the business issue. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely proposed a type of HRIS for the organization in the scenario. Did not submit or incompletely discussed the function that the HRIS serves, and did not submit or incompletely identified how that system will solve the business issue. Partiallyproposed a type of HRIS for the organization in the scenario. Partially discussed the function that the HRIS serves, and partially identified how that system will solve the business issue. Satisfactorilyproposed a type of HRIS for the organization in the scenario. Satisfactorily discussed the function that the HRIS serves, and satisfactorily identified how that system will solve the business issue. Thoroughlyproposed a type of HRIS for the organization in the scenario. Thoroughly discussed the function that the HRIS serves, and thoroughly identified how that system will solve the business issue.
3. Compare and contrast at least two (2) HRIS vendors. Based on this comparison, make a case for the one (1) vendor that you recommend for your client.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted at least two (2) HRIS vendors. Based on this comparison, did not submit or incompletely made a case for the one (1) vendor that you recommend for your client. Partiallycompared and contrasted at least two (2) HRIS vendors. Based on this comparison, partially made a case for the one (1) vendor that you recommend for your client. Satisfactorilycompared and contrasted at least two (2) HRIS vendors. Based on this comparison, satisfactorily made a case for the one (1) vendor that you recommend for your client. Thoroughlycompared and contrasted at least two (2) HRIS vendors. Based on this comparison, thoroughly made a case for the one (1) vendor that you recommend for your client.
4. Create a project management roadmap for the client with projected timelines. Discuss the costs associated with the implementation, justifying your claims with HR metrics and cost benefit analysis.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely created a project management roadmap for the client with projected timelines. Did not submit or incompletely discussed the costs associated with the implementation, justifying your claims with HR metrics and cost benefit analysis. Partiallycreated a project management roadmap for the client with projected timelines. Partially discussed the costs associated with the implementation, justifying your claims with HR metrics and cost benefit analysis. Satisfactorilycreated a project management roadmap for the client with projected timelines. Satisfactorily discussed the costs associated with the implementation, justifying your claims with HR metrics and cost benefit analysis. Thoroughlycreated a project management roadmap for the client with projected timelines. Thoroughly discussed the costs associated with the implementation, justifying your claims with HR metrics and cost benefit analysis.
5. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided. Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present


Comments are closed.