Strategic HRM Plan

Strategic HRM Plan

  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00%
75.0 %Content  
5.0 %Introduction An introduction is not present. An introduction is provided, including an explanation of how HR goals support organizational strategy and goals, but is incomplete or inaccurate. An introduction is adequately provided including an explanation of how HR goals support organizational strategy and goals. Introduction is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity. An introduction is adequately provided. Introduction is of above average quality and quantity. An analysis of how HR goals support organizational strategy and goals is justified. An introduction is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner that shows how HR goals support organizational strategy and goals. Critical and creative thinking is indicated.
5.0 %Summary of the Organizational Description A summary of the organizational description is not present. A summary of the organizational description is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. A summary of the organizational description is adequately presented. Description is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity. A summary of the organizational description is adequately presented. Description is of above average quality and quantity is provided. A summary of the organizational description is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Critical and creative thinking is indicated.
15.0 %SWOT Analysis A discussion of the SWOT analysis is not present. A discussion of the SWOT analysis is present, but the analysis or its discussion is incomplete or inaccurate. A discussion of the SWOT analysis is adequately presented. Analysis is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity. A discussion of the SWOT analysis is adequately presented. Analysis is of above average quality and is provided. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity. A discussion of the SWOT analysis presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Analysis is of exceptional quality and quantity. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
15.0 %HR Goals (SMART) An identification of HR goals that are SMART are absent. An identification of three HR goals that are SMART are present, but vague, incomplete or inaccurate. An identification of three HR goals that are SMART and are adequately presented. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity. An identification of three HR goals that are SMART are adequately presented. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity. An identification of three HR goals that are SMART are presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
15.0 %Alignment of HR Goals and Strategic Plans The alignment of HR goals and strategic plans is not present. The alignment of HR goals and organizational strategic plans is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. The alignment of HR goals and organizational strategic plans is of baseline acceptable quality. The alignment of HR goals and organizational strategic plans is clearly articulated and well-integrated. The alignment of HR goals and strategic plans is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner; goals and strategic plans are well-integrated. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
15.0 %Reflection and Application Integration and application of theory (HR concepts) to practice (chosen organization) A reflection and application of two HR concepts to the organization is absent. A reflection and application of two HR concepts to the organization is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. A reflection and application of two relevant HR concepts to the organization is adequately presented. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity. A reflection and application of two relevant HR concepts to the organization is adequately presented and clearly integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A reflection and application of two HR relevant concepts to the organization is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Critical and creative thinking is indicated.
5.0 %Conclusion A conclusion is not present. A conclusion is present including job design initiatives and organizational hiring needs, but is incomplete or inaccurate. A conclusion is adequately presented including job design initiatives and organizational hiring needs. Conclusion is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity. A conclusion is adequately presented including job design initiatives and organizational hiring needs. Conclusion is of above average quality and quantity is provided. A conclusion is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Conclusion includes job design initiatives and organizational hiring needs. Critical and creative thinking is indicated.
25.0 %Organization and Formatting  
4.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
4.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
4.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice register and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
4.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
5.0 %Research Sources (relevancy, quantity, and type specifications) Sources are not used or cited as required in the assignment instructions. Non-credible sources are used. Source relevance is vague or inconsistent. References from appropriate sources are not included: at least two academic resources. Source relevance is mostly applicable and appropriate. References from appropriate sources are included: at least two academic resources. Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances. References from appropriate sources are included: at least two academic resources. Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances and sparks interest in the reader to pursue further investigation. References from appropriate sources are used: more than two academic resources.
100 %Total Weightage  

Comments are closed.