TECHNOLOGICAL GLOBALIZATION

TECHNOLOGICAL GLOBALIZATION

7/11/2018 TaskStream

https://w.taskstream.com//RubricWizard/RubricPrintViewWithSession/PrintView?legacySessionId=&encLegacyRubricId=ugzucezdz1cgzlhp&encLegacyFolderId=f5… 1/3

MBT Task 3

value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level

Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.

The candidate provides weak articulation of response.

The candidate provides limited articulation of response.

The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.

The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

 

A. Submission Engine Plan

The candidate does not provide a submission engine plan that addresses the concerns in the scenario.

The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with no detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario.

The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with limited detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario.

The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with adequate detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario.

The candidate provides a submission engine plan, with substantial detail, that addresses the concerns in the scenario.

 

A1. Network Map The candidate does not provide a network map that includes the given points.

The candidate provides a network map, with no detail, that includes the given points.

The candidate provides a network map, with limited detail, that includes the given points.

The candidate provides a network map, with adequate detail, that includes the given points.

The candidate provides a network map, with substantial detail, that includes the given points.

 

A2. Languages The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how the submission engine plan will handle submissions in other languages, including Portuguese and Mandarin.

 

Export to Word

7/11/2018 TaskStream

https://w.taskstream.com//RubricWizard/RubricPrintViewWithSession/PrintView?legacySessionId=&encLegacyRubricId=ugzucezdz1cgzlhp&encLegacyFolderId=f5… 2/3

value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level

A3. Concerns About Bias

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to help alleviate the concerns that the content is biased toward technology professionals and educators in the United States.

 

A4. Issues Affecting Users

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of which technologies can help address the bandwidth and server lag time issues affecting users in the scenario.

 

A5. Accessibility The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how the candidate will use technologies to organize information to make it more accessible for users and employees.

 

7/11/2018 TaskStream

https://w.taskstream.com//RubricWizard/RubricPrintViewWithSession/PrintView?legacySessionId=&encLegacyRubricId=ugzucezdz1cgzlhp&encLegacyFolderId=f5… 3/3

value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level

B. Effective Communication

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate of�ce in Seattle.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate of�ce in Seattle.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate of�ce in Seattle.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate of�ce in Seattle.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how partners based in Brazil and Taiwan will use key technologies to communicate effectively with each other and with the corporate of�ce in Seattle.

 

C. Technology Trends

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of which technology trends will support the company’s mission.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of which technology trends will support the company’s mission.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of which technology trends will support the company’s mission.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of which technology trends will support the company’s mission.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of which technology trends will support the company’s mission.

 

D. Sources When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.

 


Comments are closed.